Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Ethics - Essay Example The â€Å"Operation Fast and Furious† was controversial because agents were prevented from making arrest but just to continue gather evidences to make a stronger case. The ancillary ethical dilemma of the case was the invoking of Executive Privilege by President Obama that made Attorney General Eric Holder to withhold the documents that were asked by request that eventually led him to be cited for contempt by Congress at a vote of 255 to 67. 2. Present a Resolution. State specifically WHAT you’re going to do and WHY you’re doing what you’re doing to resolve each of the ethical dilemmas. Be very specific and detailed.   In implementing the â€Å"Operation Fast and Furious† I would make a time table where I would expect results that would justify the operation. One year would be a reasonable allowance to expect result whether to continue the program or not. If within one year there are encouraging arrests of the cartels, then the operation could be continued because it is serving its purpose. But if one year has lapsed and it did not satisfy its justification, then the program should be scrapped. 3. Identify which ethical system(s) support your resolution Before delving in the ethical system that I would use to support my resolution, it is important to note that Eric Holder’s â€Å"Operation Fast and the Furious† is an offshoot of Project Gunrunner which deals with criminals and cartels. Such, the ethical system that would be used in the case should be grounded on reality and pragmatism that is applicable in fighting crimes. Having said that, there are two ethical systems that I would use; first is the hypothetical imperative and the other, utilitarianism. Hypothetical imperative presupposed the necessity of a certain action depending on the conditions that would make such action as an imperative (Pollock, 2012). For example, if we want to nourish ourselves, we have to eat. In the same manner that if we want crim inality (in this case, gunrunning and the cartel) to end, then we have to do something that would put them behind bars. There may be undesirable acts that are necessary (such as letting guns walk on the street) but if the outcome outweighs the risk (utilitarian) of not interdicting illegal firearm sale and it meets the objective of arresting cartels, then the means is justified (Pollock, 2012) and I would continue the operation. In this case, I do not question the ethical ground of â€Å"Operation Fast and the Furious†. I agree with the philosophical premise of the operation of really going after the heads of the cartels to put an end to gun running once and for all (hypothetical imperative). Letting gun runners go scot free for a moment to build a stronger case may be justifiable if that would lead to the arrest of the leaders of the cartels (utilitarian). But when there are loose firearms that could not be tracked and no leaders had been arrested, it is already an indicatio n that the program â€Å"Operation Fast and the Furious† has failed and therefore must be stopped. Moreso when the guns that were sold through the program were found in violent crimes culminating in the killing of a border police officer where he was shot by a gun acquired through â€Å"Operation Fast and Furious†. 4. Integrate any material/concepts learned in the course as your resolution.